Georgia · PWS GA1030001 · EFFINGHAM County

Rincon

What Rincon filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
22.9%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits H181agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 372.3 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H181 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 287 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I181 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

Read from data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-06. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://epd.georgia.gov/document/document/2025-water-audits/download, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
$10,200
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx2025 Water Audits Z181agency source

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 10,245 sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell Z181

Read from data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-06. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://epd.georgia.gov/document/document/2025-water-audits/download, which may since have been revised.

What the record shows

22.9% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 39% of the 228 Georgia systems that filed that year.

22.9% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 228 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 228 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 26.4%. This system is 22.9%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 22.9%Georgia median 26.4%
This series is flagged for review. The filed loss percentage has moved an average of 13.7 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 4% to 40% between FY2016 and FY2019. The flag is that comparison and nothing more: mean absolute change per year, above the seventy-fifth percentile for this state.

It does not establish what moved. A meter replacement program, a main break, a change of billing system, a corrected prior-year filing and an ordinary reporting error all produce a series that looks like this, and a filed water loss audit does not say which happened. What the flag does say is that the years disagree with each other by more than most of the state's do, so a single year of this series is a weak basis for a decision without the records behind it.

Compliance record

43 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 1 is health-based. 12 resolved, 31 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

2 filed values that cannot be true.
  • The FY2018 volumes are not published here because the filing contradicts itself — billed authorized consumption 601.6 MG exceeds this filing's own system input 345.3 MG.
  • FY2016 reports a leakage index of 0.020335641556810745, which would mean less real loss than the unavoidable minimum the same audit computes for this network.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Water balance, FY2025 · 372.3 MG system input
Billed 287 MG Unbilled authorized 0.72 MG Apparent loss 1.43 MG Real loss 83.1 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 372.3 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell H181 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 287 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell I181 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 0.72 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell K181 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 1.43 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell O181
  • Real loss 83.1 MG sheet 2025 Water Audits , cell P181

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-69903a9418bc.xlsx (SHA-256 69903a9418bc6d60), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2025 22.9% 372.3 $10,200 inapplicable
2024 16.9% 378.5 $7,070 inapplicable
2023 11.3% 356.2 $7,110 inapplicable
2022 31.8% 342.2 $17,100 inapplicable
2021 15.5% 342.2 $20,600 inapplicable
2020 14.0% 334.7 $20,500 inapplicable
2019 39.8% 334.2 $16,200 inapplicable
2018 insufficient
2016 4.1% 316.6 $8,110 inapplicable
2015 35.8% 261.4 $13,800 inapplicable
2014 33.1% 316.7 $20,100 inapplicable
2013 9.3% 282.8 $16,900 inapplicable
2012 4.5% 286.9 $16,300 inapplicable

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Effingham County SurfaceEFFINGHAM County 7.7% FY2025
Thomson- McDuffie3,300–10,000 connections 25.5% FY2025
Ellijay Gilmer County Water And Sewer Auth3,300–10,000 connections 17.8% FY2025
Barrow County3,300–10,000 connections 32.9% FY2025
Lawrenceville3,300–10,000 connections 10.7% FY2019
Haralson County3,300–10,000 connections 38.8% FY2025
Douglas3,300–10,000 connections 22.6% FY2025
Powder Springs3,300–10,000 connections 26.1% FY2018

Where is it going?

This page values the loss at roughly $10,200 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Rincon

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Rincon — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/rincon/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.