Lawrenceville
What Lawrenceville filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2011–2019 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.
- Non-revenue water, FY2019
- 10.7% Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.
- system input volume 767.9 sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell H135 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
- billed authorized consumption 685.6 sheet 2019 Water Audits, cell I135 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
- Annual value of the filed loss
- — Not estimable from what EPD publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.
2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx2019 Water Audits H135agency source
Where this figure comes from
(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100
Read from data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx (SHA-256 d59e6092c82b28b2), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-06. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://epd.georgia.gov/document/document/2019waterauditscompiled-all9-11-20xlsx/download, which may since have been revised.
What the record shows
10.7% non-revenue water in FY2019, higher than 13% of the 232 Georgia systems that filed that year.
- The figure is getting worse across the record.
Compliance record
16 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 10 are health-based. 4 resolved, 12 archived, and 0 still open.
Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.
Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.
Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.
This filing reports totals but not the components a balance is made of, so the identity
input = billed + unbilled authorized + apparent loss + real loss
has nothing to be tested against. Absent: apparent loss.
insufficient · not checkable
This is recorded as unverifiable and not reported as a pass. The difference is the one between a disclosure gap and a clean bill of health.
| Year | NRW | Input (MG) | Recoverable | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 10.7% | 767.9 | — | insufficient |
| 2018 | 18.4% | 807.5 | — | insufficient |
| 2017 | 12.7% | 789.4 | — | insufficient |
| 2016 | 6.3% | 796.7 | $122,000 | inapplicable |
| 2015 | 12.8% | 810 | $116,000 | inapplicable |
| 2014 | 10.1% | 774.4 | $139,000 | inapplicable |
| 2013 | 15.2% | 795.3 | $136,000 | inapplicable |
| 2012 | 13.4% | 825.7 | $137,000 | inapplicable |
| 2011 | 9.5% | 806.6 | $131,000 | inapplicable |
Comparable systems
In the same county.
| System | Basis for comparison | NRW |
|---|---|---|
| Buford | GWINNETT County | 19.3% FY2025 |
| Gwinnett County Dwr | GWINNETT County | 9.6% FY2025 |
| Douglas | 3,300–10,000 connections | 22.6% FY2025 |
| Moultrie | 3,300–10,000 connections | 18.5% FY2016 |
| Rincon | 3,300–10,000 connections | 22.9% FY2025 |
| Satilla Regional | 3,300–10,000 connections | 9.3% FY2025 |
| Thomson- McDuffie | 3,300–10,000 connections | 25.5% FY2025 |
| Ellijay Gilmer County Water And Sewer Auth | 3,300–10,000 connections | 17.8% FY2025 |
Where is it going?
This page values the loss. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.
Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.
See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about LawrencevilleSources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.
- Georgia EPD — validated water loss audit results, filed under the Water Stewardship Act of 2010. Retrieved 2026-09-06 from data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-d59e6092c82b.xlsx. https://epd.georgia.gov/watershed-protection-branch/water-efficiency-and-water-loss-audits