Wisconsin · PWS 5700

Stitzer Sanitary District

What Stitzer Sanitary District filed with PSC about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
22.3%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csvSheet1 H1059agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 4.62 sheet Sheet1, cell H1059 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000 · net of water sold to wholesale customers, which is the volume entering this utility's own distribution system
  • billed authorized consumption 3.59 sheet Sheet1, cell I1059 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000

Read from data/archive/wi-psc-water-audit/2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csv (SHA-256 5ef7d6e2fdbdac2b), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-08. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://apps.psc.wi.gov/ARS/WEGSqueries/default.aspx, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
Not estimable from what PSC publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.

What the record shows

22.3% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 69% of the 561 Wisconsin systems that filed that year.

22.3% non-revenue water in FY2024, against 561 Wisconsin filings for the same yearA strip of 561 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 16.0%. This system is 22.3%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 22.3%Wisconsin median 16.0%
This series is flagged for review. The filed loss percentage has moved an average of 12.1 points a year, against a Wisconsin median of 5.1, including 9% to 33% between FY2019 and FY2020. The flag is that comparison and nothing more: mean absolute change per year, above the seventy-fifth percentile for this state.

It does not establish what moved. A meter replacement program, a main break, a change of billing system, a corrected prior-year filing and an ordinary reporting error all produce a series that looks like this, and a filed water loss audit does not say which happened. What the flag does say is that the years disagree with each other by more than most of the state's do, so a single year of this series is a weak basis for a decision without the records behind it.

Debt outstanding, and what covers the interest

No bonds outstanding at the end of 2024. This is principal outstanding on a combined water and sewer utility's balance sheet, which the Commission files as one.

No bond balance is not the same as no debt. 2,310 of the 5,921 utility-years in this extract file no bonds, and many of those utilities pay interest anyway on an advance from their own municipality, which the Commission files under account 430 rather than as a bond.

Principal outstanding at the end of each year, as filed
YearDebt outstandingIssues
2024$00
2023$00
2022$00
2021$00
2020$00
2019$00
2018$00
2017$00
2016$11

This utility's balance sheet and income statement are water and sewer, filed as one. A coverage ratio computed from them would put one service's revenue over another service's interest.

Figures are as filed with the Commission under Wis. Admin. Code ch. PSC 185 and are not audited as presented. Nothing here is a credit opinion, an implied rating, or a judgement that any figure is sufficient. Source: Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, annual report financial schedules, 2016–2025, retrieved 2026-09-12.

A filed value that cannot be true.
  • The components PSC publishes for FY2022 do not sum to the system input it publishes for the same filing — a defect in the published export, not in what the utility filed.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Water balance, FY2024 · 4.62 MG system input
Billed 3.59 MG Unbilled authorized 0.35 MG Apparent loss 0 MG Real loss 0.68 MG

PSC derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 4.62 MG sheet Sheet1, cell H1059 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000 · net of water sold to wholesale customers, which is the volume entering this utility's own distribution system
  • Billed authorized 3.59 MG sheet Sheet1, cell I1059 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Unbilled authorized 0.35 MG sheet Sheet1, cell O1059 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Apparent loss 0 MG sheet Sheet1, cell R1059 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Real loss 0.68 MG sheet Sheet1, cell U1059 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000

From data/archive/wi-psc-water-audit/2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csv (SHA-256 5ef7d6e2fdbdac2b), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2024
Year NRW Input (MG)
2024 22.3% 4.62
2023 17.4% 4.61
2022 4.71
2021 17.7% 4.7
2020 33.2% 5.64
2019 9.4% 5.03
2018 0.5% 4.7
2017 20.9% 4.59
2016 31.9% 5

Balance closure is inapplicable on every filed year above, so the column that repeated it is not shown. FY2016, FY2017, FY2018, FY2019, FY2020, FY2021, FY2023, FY2024: PSC derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction. FY2022: The components PSC publishes contradict each other, which is a defect in the export rather than in the filing. This is neither a pass nor a disclosure gap.

Other Wisconsin systems

PSC publishes no county or connection count for these systems, so they cannot be ranked against this one. These are other filers, not comparables.

Where is it going?

This page values the loss. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Stitzer Sanitary District

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Stitzer Sanitary District — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/wi/stitzer-sanitary-district/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.