Wisconsin · PWS 210

Arcadia Electric And Water

What Arcadia Electric And Water filed with PSC about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2025 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2025
4.4%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csvSheet1 H19agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 394.7 sheet Sheet1, cell H19 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000 · net of water sold to wholesale customers, which is the volume entering this utility's own distribution system
  • billed authorized consumption 377.4 sheet Sheet1, cell I19 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000

Read from data/archive/wi-psc-water-audit/2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csv (SHA-256 5ef7d6e2fdbdac2b), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-08. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://apps.psc.wi.gov/ARS/WEGSqueries/default.aspx, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
Not estimable from what PSC publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.

What the record shows

4.4% non-revenue water in FY2025, higher than 8% of the 562 Wisconsin systems that filed that year.

4.4% non-revenue water in FY2025, against 562 Wisconsin filings for the same yearA strip of 562 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 16.6%. This system is 4.4%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 4.4%Wisconsin median 16.6%

Debt outstanding, and what covers the interest

$7.8M of long-term debt outstanding at the end of 2025, across 5 bond issues. This is principal outstanding on a combined water and electric utility's balance sheet, which the Commission files as one.

Principal outstanding at the end of each year, as filed
YearDebt outstandingIssues
2025$7.8M5
2024$8.0M5
2023$8.9M6
2022$9.7M6
2021$10.6M6
2020$11.4M6
2019$12.1M6
2018$10.7M6
2017$10.4M5
2016$11.1M5

This utility's balance sheet and income statement are water and electric, filed as one. A coverage ratio computed from them would put one service's revenue over another service's interest.

Figures are as filed with the Commission under Wis. Admin. Code ch. PSC 185 and are not audited as presented. Nothing here is a credit opinion, an implied rating, or a judgement that any figure is sufficient. Source: Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, annual report financial schedules, 2016–2025, retrieved 2026-09-12.

A filed value that cannot be true.
  • The components PSC publishes for FY2019 do not sum to the system input it publishes for the same filing — a defect in the published export, not in what the utility filed.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Water balance, FY2025 · 394.7 MG system input
Billed 377.4 MG Unbilled authorized 17.1 MG Apparent loss 0 MG Real loss 0.14 MG

PSC derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 394.7 MG sheet Sheet1, cell H19 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000 · net of water sold to wholesale customers, which is the volume entering this utility's own distribution system
  • Billed authorized 377.4 MG sheet Sheet1, cell I19 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Unbilled authorized 17.1 MG sheet Sheet1, cell O19 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Apparent loss 0 MG sheet Sheet1, cell R19 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000
  • Real loss 0.14 MG sheet Sheet1, cell U19 · thousands of gallons, declared in the column header, divided by 1,000

From data/archive/wi-psc-water-audit/2026-09-08-5ef7d6e2fdbd.csv (SHA-256 5ef7d6e2fdbdac2b), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2025
Year NRW Input (MG) Balance
2025 4.4% 394.7 inapplicable
2024 5.3% 447.6 inapplicable
2023 4.8% 433.6 insufficient
2022 4.9% 414.3 inapplicable
2021 5.1% 427.1 insufficient
2020 5.9% 439 inapplicable
2019 6.4% 445.6 inapplicable
2018 6.8% 452.2 inapplicable
2017 6.0% 430.3 inapplicable
2016 5.4% 453.2 inapplicable

Other Wisconsin systems

PSC publishes no county or connection count for these systems, so they cannot be ranked against this one. These are other filers, not comparables.

Where is it going?

This page values the loss. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Arcadia Electric And Water

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Arcadia Electric And Water — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/wi/arcadia-electric-and-water/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.