Texas · PWS TX1010018 · HARRIS County

La Porte

What La Porte filed with TWDB about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2015–2023 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2023
23.1%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx2023 AP420agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 1,658 sheet 2023, cell AP420 · converted to million gallons from the unit the filing states
  • billed authorized consumption 1,275 sheet 2023, cell AU420 · converted to million gallons from the unit the filing states

Read from data/archive/twdb/2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx (SHA-256 7270fa7072e51e70), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-08-11. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/doc/water-loss-data/sources/historical-water-loss-audit-data.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
$369,000
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, and real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate, and shown to three significant figures.

2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx2023 CD420agency source

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 185,371 sheet 2023, cell CD420 · republished only where the retail price it implies is one a utility could charge
  • cost of real losses, as filed 183,728 sheet 2023, cell CH420 · republished only where the production cost it implies is one a utility could incur

Read from data/archive/twdb/2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx (SHA-256 7270fa7072e51e70), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-08-11. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/doc/water-loss-data/sources/historical-water-loss-audit-data.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

Apparent loss that is a default
5.1%

MeasuredTWDB default

TWDB supplied the default value for unauthorized consumption rather than this utility measuring it.

2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx2023 BL420agency source

Where this figure comes from

defaulted apparent-loss components ÷ total apparent loss × 100

  • apparent loss 62.2 sheet 2023, cell BL420 · converted to million gallons from the unit the filing states

Read from data/archive/twdb/2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx (SHA-256 7270fa7072e51e70), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-08-11. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/doc/water-loss-data/sources/historical-water-loss-audit-data.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

What the filing says

La Porte serves 14,004 retail connections and about 34,733 people. Because it reports more than 3,300 connections, it is on an annual water loss audit cycle with TWDB.

What the record shows

23.1% non-revenue water in FY2023, higher than 68% of the 785 Texas systems that filed that year.

23.1% non-revenue water in FY2023, against 785 Texas filings for the same yearA strip of 785 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 16.3%. This system is 23.1%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 23.1%Texas median 16.3%

Compliance record

3 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2. 3 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2023 · 1,658 MG system input
Billed 1,275 MG Unbilled authorized 93 MG Apparent loss 62.2 MG Real loss 227.4 MG

TWDB derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 1,658 MG sheet 2023, cell AP420 · converted to million gallons from the unit the filing states
  • Billed authorized 1,275 MG sheet 2023, cell AU420 · converted to million gallons from the unit the filing states
  • Unbilled authorized 93 MG computed here, not read from a cell
  • Apparent loss 62.2 MG sheet 2023, cell BL420 · converted to million gallons from the unit the filing states
  • Real loss 227.4 MG sheet 2023, cell BQ420

From data/archive/twdb/2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx (SHA-256 7270fa7072e51e70), retrieved 2026-08-11 from the published source.

Filed history, 2015–2023
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2023 23.1% 1,658 $369,000
2022 15.2% 1,437 $270,000
2021 16.1% 1,360 $253,000
2020 14.3% 1,346 $225,000
2019 12.6% 1,325 $205,000
2018 18.2% 1,410 $269,000
2017 25.5% 1,500 $380,000
2016 19.8% 1,368 $286,000
2015 19.4% 1,413 $266,000

Balance closure is inapplicable on every filed year above, so the column that repeated it is not shown. TWDB derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction. This is neither a pass nor a disclosure gap.

How much of this figure was measured

Apparent loss is three components: customer meter inaccuracy, unauthorized consumption, and data handling error. TWDB supplies a default value for the last two when a utility does not measure them, and records which in its export. Across the published record, unauthorized consumption is a default on 95% of filings, data handling error on 30%. The median filing is 14.4% defaulted, and 1,329 filings are more than half. TWDB's own data-validity score averages 68.4 out of 100 on the 9,315 filings using a default, against 70.0 on the 429 using none — so the score does not tell the two apart.

5.1% of La Porte's reported apparent loss for FY2023 is a default rather than a measurement. How much of a Texas loss figure is measured sets this out across the whole filed record.

How the loss is valued

Apparent loss is water that reached a customer and was never billed: under-registering meters, data-handling errors, unauthorized use. It is valued here at the retail rate, because water that reached a customer would have sold at that rate. Real loss is valued at variable production cost only, since eliminating a leak saves what it cost to treat and pump the water rather than what it would have sold for. Valuing both at the retail rate is how a loss study produces a number nobody in a finance department believes, and that is the mistake this figure is built to avoid.

This is the value of the loss, not an amount anyone has established is recoverable. How much of it a utility can actually collect depends on which meters are under-registering, which accounts are unbilled, and what a replacement or an audit of those accounts would cost. None of that is in a filed water loss audit, and this page does not claim to know it.

Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water, and real loss at its own reported variable production cost. Not our estimate, and shown to three significant figures.

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Harris County MUD 165HARRIS County 14.3% FY2024
Deer ParkHARRIS County 20.1% FY2023
KatyHARRIS County 8.8% FY2024
Timber Lane Utility DistrictHARRIS County 14.5% FY2024
Clear Lake CityHARRIS County 13.4% FY2024
Northwest Harris County MUD 5HARRIS County 14.2% FY2024
Bridgestone MUDHARRIS County 14.4% FY2024
HumbleHARRIS County 12.9% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page values the loss at roughly $369,000 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about La Porte

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “La Porte — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/la-porte/ (source filings retrieved 2026-08-11).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.