# Clarksville — water loss as filed

TWDB · PWS TX1940002 · RED RIVER County · filings 2024–2024
https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/clarksville/

> **Cite as:** Municorn.us, "Clarksville — water loss as filed", Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/clarksville/ (source filings retrieved 2026-08-11).
> **Licence:** CC BY 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this URL.
> **Caveat that must travel with these figures:** "Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.

## Summary

Clarksville reported **96.3% non-revenue water** in FY2024, higher than 100% of the 908 Texas systems that filed that year. At the utility's own reported water rates that is **$223,000 a year** (modeled). Apparent loss at the TX median retail rate of $4.75/kgal, the median of 9493 rates filed by TX utilities themselves (2015–2024); real loss at $1.59/kgal variable cost. Substitute your own rate for an exact figure. 2.0% of its reported apparent loss is a TWDB default rather than a measurement.

**The water balance is not a check here.** TWDB derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction.

**Notes on individual filings.** TWDB records problems and granted waivers against a filing in its own export. Where we have found something it does not flag, that is stated here too.

- **FY2024.** The filing states a retail price of $2.25 per gallon — $2,250 per thousand gallons, which no water utility charges. It is almost certainly a per-thousand-gallon price entered in a per-gallon field. TWDB computes its published cost of water losses from this figure, so that cost is inflated by about 1,000x for this filing. Both are omitted here rather than repeated. The filing states a variable production cost of $1,250.00 per thousand gallons. Filed variable production costs outside $0.1 to $25 are not published here, so that cost and TWDB's cost of real losses computed from it are both omitted.

## Filed history

| Year | Non-revenue water % | System input (MG) | Cost of losses/yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 96.3% | 142.8 | $223,000 |

Balance closure is `inapplicable` on every filed year above, so the column that repeated it is
not shown. TWDB derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction. This is neither a pass nor a disclosure gap.

## How much of the loss figure was measured

Apparent loss is meter inaccuracy plus unauthorized consumption plus data handling error. TWDB supplies a default
for the last two when a utility does not measure them and flags which in its export: unauthorized consumption is a default on 95% of filings, data handling error on 30%. The median filing is 14.4% defaulted, and 1,329 filings are more than half. TWDB's own data-validity score averages 68.4 out of 100 on the 9,315 filings using a default, against 70.0 on the 429 using none — so the score does not tell the two apart.

[How much of a Texas loss figure is measured](https://municorn.us/water-loss/how-much-of-a-loss-figure-is-measured/) sets this out across the whole filed record.

## What this source cannot say

No filed year on this page carries a retail rate or a production cost, so no figure here is valued. A loss volume
is not a loss in dollars, and this site will not supply a price that was not filed.

## Source

Texas Water Development Board — historical water loss audit data. Retrieved 2026-08-11. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/doc/water-loss-data/sources/historical-water-loss-audit-data.xlsx

The FY2024 loss figure: (system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100, from system input volume at `2024!AP110`; billed authorized consumption at `2024!AU110` — in `data/archive/twdb/2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx` (sha256 7270fa7072e51e70, retrieved 2026-08-11, https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/doc/water-loss-data/sources/historical-water-loss-audit-data.xlsx), read by `src/scrape/tx.ts` at 87874f6647ff.

The annual figure in dollars: apparent loss × 1,000 × retail price + real loss × 1,000 × variable production cost, from apparent loss at `2024!BL110`; real loss at `2024!BQ110` — in `data/archive/twdb/2026-08-11-7270fa7072e5.xlsx` (sha256 7270fa7072e51e70, retrieved 2026-08-11, https://www.twdb.texas.gov/conservation/data/doc/water-loss-data/sources/historical-water-loss-audit-data.xlsx), read by `src/scrape/tx.ts` at 87874f6647ff.

Volumes are normalized to million gallons on ingest; the export reports them in the unit each filing states.

Figures are as filed unless stated otherwise. If a number here is wrong it is wrong in the filing or wrong in
our reading of it, and both are worth knowing: ammar@municorn.us

_Municorn.us · https://municorn.us/water-loss/tx/clarksville/ · CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ · source filings retrieved 2026-08-11_

---

## Compliance record

Violations on EPA's record as of 2026Q2: **30** (10 health-based).
Resolved: 27. Archived: 1. **Still open: 2.**

- Monitoring, Source Water (GWR) — unaddressed, from July 9, 2025
- Consumer Confidence Report Inadequate Reporting — unaddressed, from July 2, 2024

Counted as distinct violations rather than as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken
against a violation. A violation is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported
to EPA; it is not a measurement of the water.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2.