Indiana · PWS IN5230006

Sugar Creek Utilities - Ninestar Connect

What Sugar Creek Utilities - Ninestar Connect filed with IFA about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2019–2021 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2021
1.3%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsxSheet1 H353agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 8.09 sheet Sheet1, cell H353 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • billed authorized consumption 7.98 sheet Sheet1, cell I353 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

Read from data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsx (SHA-256 b0699cbe4f4ea882), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-08. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.in.gov/ifa/files/2022-Appendix-B-for-Water-Loss-Report-revised-Aug2023.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
Not estimable from what IFA publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.

What the record shows

1.3% non-revenue water in FY2021, higher than 0% of the 383 Indiana systems that filed that year.

1.3% non-revenue water in FY2021, against 383 Indiana filings for the same yearA strip of 383 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 23.5%. This system is 1.3%. 7 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 1.3%Indiana median 23.5%

Compliance record

120 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 3 are health-based. 116 resolved, 4 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2021 · 8.09 MG system input
Billed 7.98 MG Unbilled authorized 0.02 MG Apparent loss 0.04 MG Real loss 0.04 MG

IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 8.09 MG sheet Sheet1, cell H353 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • Billed authorized 7.98 MG sheet Sheet1, cell I353 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 0.02 MG sheet Sheet1, cell K353 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 0.04 MG sheet Sheet1, cell O353
  • Real loss 0.04 MG sheet Sheet1, cell P353

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsx (SHA-256 b0699cbe4f4ea882), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2019–2021
Year NRW Input (MG)
2021 1.3% 8.09
2019 4.0% 7.38

Balance closure is inapplicable on every filed year above, so the column that repeated it is not shown. IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction. This is neither a pass nor a disclosure gap.

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Ambia, Town Ofunder 1,000 connections 9.1% FY2023
Decker, Town Ofunder 1,000 connections 40.0% FY2023
Fort Wayne City Utilities - Honeysuckleunder 1,000 connections 33.4% FY2021
South Coastunder 1,000 connections 2.4% FY2023
Corunnaunder 1,000 connections 73.4% FY2019
Kingbury Utility Corporationunder 1,000 connections 35.4% FY2019
Newberry Waterunder 1,000 connections 4.2% FY2023
Craneunder 1,000 connections

Where is it going?

This page values the loss. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Sugar Creek Utilities - Ninestar Connect

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Sugar Creek Utilities - Ninestar Connect — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/sugar-creek-utilities-ninestar-connect/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.