Indiana · PWS IN5232017

North Salem Water Corporation

What North Salem Water Corporation filed with IFA about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2019–2023 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2023
34.1%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsxSheet1 H314agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 11.1 sheet Sheet1, cell H314 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • billed authorized consumption 7.34 sheet Sheet1, cell I314 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

Read from data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsx (SHA-256 c8960b5d1f332b53), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-08. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.in.gov/ifa/files/2024-WLA-Report-Appendix-B-revised14July2025.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
$2,530
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — IFA publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsxSheet1 AA314agency source

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 2,528 sheet Sheet1, cell AA314

Read from data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsx (SHA-256 c8960b5d1f332b53), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-08. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.in.gov/ifa/files/2024-WLA-Report-Appendix-B-revised14July2025.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

What the record shows

34.1% non-revenue water in FY2023, higher than 76% of the 430 Indiana systems that filed that year.

34.1% non-revenue water in FY2023, against 430 Indiana filings for the same yearA strip of 430 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 22.6%. This system is 34.1%. 7 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 34.1%Indiana median 22.6%

Compliance record

14 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 6 are health-based. 12 resolved, 2 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2023 · 11.1 MG system input
Billed 7.34 MG Unbilled authorized 0.94 MG Apparent loss 0.21 MG Real loss 2.65 MG

IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 11.1 MG sheet Sheet1, cell H314 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • Billed authorized 7.34 MG sheet Sheet1, cell I314 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 0.94 MG sheet Sheet1, cell K314 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 0.21 MG sheet Sheet1, cell O314
  • Real loss 2.65 MG sheet Sheet1, cell P314

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-c8960b5d1f33.xlsx (SHA-256 c8960b5d1f332b53), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2019–2023
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2023 34.1% 11.1 $2,530
2021 35.7% 11.4 $453
2019 34.8% 11.2 $457

Balance closure is inapplicable on every filed year above, so the column that repeated it is not shown. IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction. This is neither a pass nor a disclosure gap.

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Elnoraunder 1,000 connections 7.8% FY2021
Cynthianaunder 1,000 connections 27.9% FY2023
Miltonunder 1,000 connections 31.5% FY2023
Orlandunder 1,000 connections 54.8% FY2019
Kingman, Town Ofunder 1,000 connections 12.9% FY2023
Reynolds, Town Ofunder 1,000 connections 22.1% FY2023
Hudsonunder 1,000 connections 16.3% FY2019
Lacrosseunder 1,000 connections 14.2% FY2023

Where is it going?

This page values the loss at roughly $2,530 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about North Salem Water Corporation

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “North Salem Water Corporation — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/north-salem-water-corporation/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.