Indiana · PWS IN5268013

L&m Regional Water District

What L&m Regional Water District filed with IFA about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2019–2021 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2021
18.3%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsxSheet1 H199agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 11.1 sheet Sheet1, cell H199 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • billed authorized consumption 9.07 sheet Sheet1, cell I199 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

Read from data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsx (SHA-256 b0699cbe4f4ea882), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-08. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.in.gov/ifa/files/2022-Appendix-B-for-Water-Loss-Report-revised-Aug2023.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
$2,500
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — IFA publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsxSheet1 AA199agency source

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 2,497 sheet Sheet1, cell AA199

Read from data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsx (SHA-256 b0699cbe4f4ea882), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-08. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://www.in.gov/ifa/files/2022-Appendix-B-for-Water-Loss-Report-revised-Aug2023.xlsx, which may since have been revised.

What the record shows

18.3% non-revenue water in FY2021, higher than 36% of the 383 Indiana systems that filed that year.

18.3% non-revenue water in FY2021, against 383 Indiana filings for the same yearA strip of 383 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 23.5%. This system is 18.3%. 7 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 18.3%Indiana median 23.5%

Compliance record

18 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 3 are health-based. 13 resolved, 4 archived, and 1 still open.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

Water balance, FY2021 · 11.1 MG system input
Billed 9.07 MG Unbilled authorized 1.61 MG Apparent loss 0.28 MG Real loss 0.14 MG

IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 11.1 MG sheet Sheet1, cell H199 · million gallons per year, declared in the column header in all three vintages
  • Billed authorized 9.07 MG sheet Sheet1, cell I199 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 1.61 MG sheet Sheet1, cell K199 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 0.28 MG sheet Sheet1, cell O199
  • Real loss 0.14 MG sheet Sheet1, cell P199

From data/archive/in-ifa-water-loss/2026-09-08-b0699cbe4f4e.xlsx (SHA-256 b0699cbe4f4ea882), retrieved 2026-09-08 from the published source.

Filed history, 2019–2021
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2021 18.3% 11.1 $2,500
2019 13.2% 9.37 $619

Balance closure is inapplicable on every filed year above, so the column that repeated it is not shown. IFA derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction. This is neither a pass nor a disclosure gap.

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Vernonunder 1,000 connections 23.5% FY2021
Laurelunder 1,000 connections 39.0% FY2023
Claypool, Town Ofunder 1,000 connections 27.5% FY2021
Indiana American Water - Somersetunder 1,000 connections 24.1% FY2023
Lizton Waterunder 1,000 connections 66.8% FY2021
Alfordsville Waterunder 1,000 connections 2.9% FY2021
Mt. Summit Waterunder 1,000 connections 12.9% FY2023
Fillmoreunder 1,000 connections 11.6% FY2019

Where is it going?

This page values the loss at roughly $2,500 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about L&m Regional Water District

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “L&m Regional Water District — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/in/l-and-m-regional-water-district/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-08).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.