Georgia · PWS GA1930002 · MACON County

Montezuma

What Montezuma filed with EPD about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2012–2020 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2020
52.8%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsxFinal Version H159agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 162.8 sheet Final Version, cell H159 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • billed authorized consumption 76.8 sheet Final Version, cell I159 · billed metered plus billed unmetered

Read from data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-06. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://epd.georgia.gov/document/document/2020-water-audit-posting-version-7-26-21xlsx/download, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
$18,500
Apparent loss is valued at this utility's own reported retail price of water. Real loss is NOT included — EPD publishes a variable production cost whose unit it does not declare, so no dollar figure is put on the leaked water. The real recoverable total is higher than this by an amount this filing does not let anyone state.

2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsxFinal Version Y159agency source

Where this figure comes from

cost of apparent losses + cost of real losses, both as computed in the filed audit

  • cost of apparent losses, as filed 18,508 sheet Final Version, cell Y159

Read from data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-06. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://epd.georgia.gov/document/document/2020-water-audit-posting-version-7-26-21xlsx/download, which may since have been revised.

What the record shows

52.8% non-revenue water in FY2020, higher than 95% of the 230 Georgia systems that filed that year.

52.8% non-revenue water in FY2020, against 230 Georgia filings for the same yearA strip of 230 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 25.2%. This system is 52.8%. 4 filings above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 52.8%Georgia median 25.2%
This series is flagged for review. The filed loss percentage has moved an average of 8.6 points a year, against a Georgia median of 4.9, including 44% to 25% between FY2015 and FY2016. The flag is that comparison and nothing more: mean absolute change per year, above the seventy-fifth percentile for this state.

It does not establish what moved. A meter replacement program, a main break, a change of billing system, a corrected prior-year filing and an ordinary reporting error all produce a series that looks like this, and a filed water loss audit does not say which happened. What the flag does say is that the years disagree with each other by more than most of the state's do, so a single year of this series is a weak basis for a decision without the records behind it.

Compliance record

18 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 1 is health-based. 9 resolved, 9 archived, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

What is missing from this record, and why

EPD published 5 filings for Montezuma that this page does not show: FY2021–FY2025. Montezuma did file, and the filing is in EPD's published results.

It is absent here because two systems in one county filed under this identifier, and nothing in the file says which owns it, filed as GA1930003, GA0930003. Publishing it under that identifier would attribute this utility's water balance to a different named system, and deciding which system a contradicting filing belongs to is not a decision this pipeline is allowed to make. Read the gap as ours, not as a utility that stopped reporting.

Water balance, FY2020 · 162.8 MG system input
Billed 76.8 MG Unbilled authorized 2.03 MG Apparent loss 4.63 MG Real loss 79.3 MG

EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 162.8 MG sheet Final Version, cell H159 · million gallons per year, declared in the header through 2020 and settled for 2021-2025 by EPD's own cost arithmetic and by continuity across the change
  • Billed authorized 76.8 MG sheet Final Version, cell I159 · billed metered plus billed unmetered
  • Unbilled authorized 2.03 MG sheet Final Version, cell K159 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered
  • Apparent loss 4.63 MG sheet Final Version, cell O159
  • Real loss 79.3 MG sheet Final Version, cell P159

From data/archive/ga-epd-water-loss/2026-09-06-9d39065752cb.xlsx (SHA-256 9d39065752cb61df), retrieved 2026-09-06 from the published source.

Filed history, 2012–2020
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable
2020 52.8% 162.8 $18,500
2019 60.2% 194 $18,900
2018 47.0% 138.8 $17,600
2017 30.3% 145.7 $23,800
2016 25.4% 138.4 $24,100
2015 44.2% 142.2 $10,300
2014 43.7% 166.1 $12,100
2013 47.3% 191.3 $19,700
2012 50.8% 206.8 $20,000

Balance closure is inapplicable on every filed year above, so the column that repeated it is not shown. EPD derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so this decomposition holds by construction. This is neither a pass nor a disclosure gap.

Comparable systems

In the same county.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
OglethorpeMACON County 31.8% FY2025
Sylvania1,000–3,300 connections 33.4% FY2025
Usaf-robins Air Force Base Main1,000–3,300 connections 36.3% FY2025
Savannah - Whitemarsh1,000–3,300 connections 27.4% FY2025
Lakeland1,000–3,300 connections 37.2% FY2018
Lake Arrowhead Utility Company1,000–3,300 connections 28.0% FY2025
Sylvania1,000–3,300 connections 39.0% FY2022
Leesburg1,000–3,300 connections 8.7% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page values the loss at roughly $18,500 a year. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Montezuma

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Montezuma — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ga/montezuma/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-06).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.