California · PWS CA0300073

Amador Water Agency - Pg&e

What Amador Water Agency - Pg&e filed with DWR about the water it produced and the water it billed for, 2016–2024 — and what the filing does and does not let anyone verify.

Non-revenue water, FY2024
0.7%
Computed from filed system input and billed consumption.

2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csvSheet1 AN84agency source

Where this figure comes from

(system input − billed authorized) ÷ system input × 100

  • system input volume 0.48 sheet Sheet1, cell AN84 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • billed authorized consumption 0.48 sheet Sheet1, cell AQ84 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet

Read from data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), our archived copy of the file as it stood on 2026-09-05. That path is committed to the repository and is not served here. The agency publishes its own current copy at https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/d6cdd89e-49b0-4b1f-86ee-8b7237e5f169/resource/058ac6ca-a8b4-4f28-b6c8-11e48309f3b4/download/ca-retailer-waterlossdata.csv, which may since have been revised.

Annual value of the filed loss
Not estimable from what DWR publishes. A loss percentage cannot be priced without the volume it is a share of.

What the record shows

0.7% non-revenue water in FY2024, higher than 0% of the 545 California systems that filed that year.

0.7% non-revenue water in FY2024, against 545 California filings for the same yearA strip of 545 filings on a 0 to 64% axis. The median is 9.2%. This system is 0.7%. 1 filing above 64% are drawn at the right edge.0%10%20%30%40%50%60%This system 0.7%California median 9.2%
This series is flagged for review. The filed loss percentage has moved an average of 12.4 points a year, against a California median of 2.6, including 100% to 1% between FY2022 and FY2023. The flag is that comparison and nothing more: mean absolute change per year, above the seventy-fifth percentile for this state.

It does not establish what moved. A meter replacement program, a main break, a change of billing system, a corrected prior-year filing and an ordinary reporting error all produce a series that looks like this, and a filed water loss audit does not say which happened. What the flag does say is that the years disagree with each other by more than most of the state's do, so a single year of this series is a weak basis for a decision without the records behind it.

What it charges

No bill is published for this system. This system did not state a billing frequency, so the period a charge covers is not established.

It did answer the Board's customer-charge questions for reporting year 2025; what is missing is what a comparable figure needs.

Source: California State Water Resources Control Board, electronic Annual Report 2025, section 8a, filed under Health and Safety Code section 116530. How every California bill on this site compares.

Compliance record

2 violations on EPA's record for this system as of 2026Q2, of which 1 is health-based. 2 resolved, and 0 still open.

Nothing on the record is open as of 2026Q2.

Counted as distinct violations, not as rows: EPA's export carries one row per enforcement action taken against a violation, so a row count would multiply this system's record several times over. A violation here is a breach of a reporting, monitoring or contaminant-level rule as reported to EPA — it is not a measurement of the water, and this site has none.

Source: US EPA, Safe Drinking Water Information System, via the ECHO national download, 2026Q2. How we hold it.

2 filed values that cannot be true.
  • FY2024 reports a leakage index of 8.91532411360258e-16, which would mean less real loss than the unavoidable minimum the same audit computes for this network.
  • FY2023 reports a leakage index of 0.00883832872971302, which would mean less real loss than the unavoidable minimum the same audit computes for this network.

Each is reproduced exactly as filed and excluded from every figure computed on this page. A number that contradicts its own audit is a finding about the filing, not a gap in ours.

Who filed this audit

Amador Water Agency filed 6 separate audits for FY2024, one for each public water system it operates, and this page is one of them. California keys its water loss export on the filing organization and not on the system, so a count of California audits is not a count of independent utilities. Amador Water Agency made one set of decisions and filed it 6 times. Read any statewide figure with that in mind, including the ones on this site.

Every figure on this page is read from DWR's published export as this site holds it: a 184-column extract of DWR's 190-column file. Six columns naming individuals, including the contact and the third-party validator, are removed before the bytes are committed, so the click path behind each figure lands on the extract and not on DWR's original. The column letters differ from DWR's for that reason.

Water balance, FY2024 · 0.48 MG system input
Billed 0.48 MG Unbilled authorized 0 MG Apparent loss 0 MG Real loss 0 MG

DWR derives water losses from system input minus authorized consumption, so these parts sum to the whole on every filing. What a filing can get wrong is which of these numbers were measured.

Where these volumes come from
  • System input 0.48 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AN84 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Billed authorized 0.48 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AQ84 · billed metered plus billed unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Unbilled authorized 0 MG sheet Sheet1, cell AW84 · unbilled metered plus unbilled unmetered, converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Apparent loss 0 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CC84 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet
  • Real loss 0 MG sheet Sheet1, cell CE84 · converted to million gallons from acre-feet

From data/archive/ca-dwr-water-loss/2026-09-05-f0dfea5a6026.csv (SHA-256 f0dfea5a6026881d), retrieved 2026-09-05 from the published source.

Filed history, 2016–2024
Year NRW Input (MG) Recoverable Balance
2024 0.7% 0.48 inapplicable
2023 0.9% 1.02 $36 inapplicable
2022 100.0% 3.12 $0 inapplicable
2021 100.0% 0.58 $6 inapplicable
2020 100.0% 0.99 $0 inapplicable
2019 100.0% 0.78 $6 insufficient
2018 100.0% 1.02 $8 insufficient
2017 100.0% 0.73 $6 insufficient
2016 100.0% 0.41 $3 inapplicable

Comparable systems

The same size band — under 1,000 connections.

SystemBasis for comparisonNRW
Port Hueneme Water Agencyunder 1,000 connections 0.8% FY2023
Lompocunder 1,000 connections 71.7% FY2025
Big Bear Lake Department Ofunder 1,000 connections 0.0% FY2025
Lake Hemet Municipal Water Districtunder 1,000 connections 100.0% FY2020
Placer County Water Agency Monte Vistaunder 1,000 connections 0.8% FY2024
Tuolumne Utilites District - Wards Ferryunder 1,000 connections 4.7% FY2024
Gswc - South Shoreunder 1,000 connections 40.0% FY2024
South Feather Water & Power Agency - Btpunder 1,000 connections 11.5% FY2024

Where is it going?

This page values the loss. It cannot say which accounts, which zones, or which meters, and it cannot say how much of that value is collectable. Answering either takes your billing history, your meter reads, and your production data reconciled against each other.

Our Water Loss Recovery Snapshot is three weeks, one flat fee, and the deliverable is a ranked list of specific accounts and zones with dollars and a confidence on each.

See what the Snapshot delivers Email us about Amador Water Agency - Pg&e

Sources and corrections. Every figure above is either filed by the utility or computed from filed figures, and each one says which. If a number here looks wrong, tell us: the error may be in the filing, in our reading of it, or in something the export does not show. Send a correction. We will check it against the source, correct the page where it is wrong, and say what changed.

Cite as

Municorn.us, “Amador Water Agency - Pg&e — water loss as filed”, Municorn water loss index, https://municorn.us/water-loss/ca/amador-water-agency-pg-and-e/ (source filings retrieved 2026-09-05).

CC BY 4.0 — reuse and redistribution are permitted with attribution to Municorn.us and a link to this page. Terms, and the one caveat that must travel with these figures.

"Water loss" is at least three different quantities depending on the jurisdiction, and nothing here supports a comparison between states.